proxmox ext4 vs xfs. on NVME, vMware and Hyper-V will do 2. proxmox ext4 vs xfs

 
 on NVME, vMware and Hyper-V will do 2proxmox ext4 vs xfs A mininal WSL distribution that would chroot to the XFS root that then runs a script to mount the ZFS dataset and then start postgres would be my preferred solution, if it's not possible to do that from CBL-Mariner (to reduce the number of things used, as simplicity often brings more performance)

I have a system with Proxmox VE 5. Features of the XFS and ZFS. Introduction. BTRFS is working on per-subvolume settings (new data written in. Since we have used a Filebench workloads for testing, our idea was to find the best FS for each test. Basically, LVM with XFS and swap. kwinz. Still, I am exclusively use XFS where there is no diverse media under the system (SATA/SAS only, or SSD only), and had no real problem for decades, since it's simple and it's fast. 0 /sec. Elegir un sistema de archivos local 1. Also, the disk we are testing has contained one of the three FSs: ext4, xfs or btrfs. Hdd space wasting as the OS only take a couple of gb) or setup a ZFS pool with all available disks during installation and install the OS to that pool? I have 5 ssd disks in total: 3x500 gb and 2x120gb. Hit Options and change EXT4 to ZFS (Raid 1). €420,00EUR. 또한 ext3. Common Commands for ext3 and ext4 Compared to XFS If you found this article helpful then do click on 👏 the button and also feel free to drop a comment. Since Proxmox VE 7 does not offer out-of-the-box support for mdraid (there is support for ZFS RAID-1, though), I had to come up with a solution to migrate the base installation to an. But they come with the smallest set of features compared to newer filesystems. Btrfs is still developmental and has some deficiencies that need to be worked out - but have made a fair amount of progress. Situation: Ceph as backend storage SSD storage Writeback cache on VM disk No LVM inside VM CloudLinux 7. ago. 527660] XFS: loop5(22218) possible memory allocation deadlock size 44960 in kmem_alloc (mode:0x2400240) As soon as I get. ZFS vs EXT4 for Host OS, and other HDD decisions. It was basically developed to allow one to combine many inexpensive and small disks into an array in order to realize redundancy goals. 2 Use it in Proxmox. 1. The problem here is that overlay2 only supports EXT4 and XFS as backing filesystems, not ZFS. ZFS combines a filesystem and volume manager. Btrfs uses Copy-on-Write (COW), a resource management technique where a. I've tried to use the typical mkfs. By far, XFS can handle large data better than any other filesystem on this list and do it reliably too. Januar 2020. Inside of Storage Click Add dropdown then select Directory. 1. (Equivalent to running update-grub on systems with ext4 or xfs on root). LVM-thin is preferable for this task, because it offers efficient support for snapshots and clones. 0 moved to XFS in 2014. 04 Proxmox VM gluster (10. 04. With the integrated web-based user interface you can manage VMs and containers, high availability for. ext4 on the other hand has delayed allocation and a lot of other goodies that will make it more space efficient. I want to use 1TB of this zpool as storage for 2 VMs. XFS supports larger file sizes and. Key Takeaway: ZFS and BTRFS are two popular file systems used for storing data, both of which offer advanced features such as copy-on-write technology, snapshots, RAID configurations and built in compression algorithms. So it has no barring. btrfs for this feature. ”. As pointed out by the comments deduplication does not make sense as Proxmox stores backups in binary chunks (mostly of 4MiB) and does the deduplication and most of the. Samsung, in particular, is known for their rock solid reliability. Storages which present block devices (LVM, ZFS, Ceph) will require the raw disk image format, whereas files based storages (Ext4, NFS, CIFS, GlusterFS) will let you to choose either the raw disk image format or the QEMU image format. Everything on the ZFS volume freely shares space, so for example you don't need to statically decide how much space Proxmox's root FS requires, it can grow or shrink as needed. Você deve ativar as cotas na montagem inicial. 49. 1. At the same time, XFS often required a kernel compile, so it got less attention from end. Con: rumor has it that it is slower than ext3, the fsync dataloss soap. There is no need for manually compile ZFS modules - all packages are included. A) crater. If i am using ZFS with proxmox, then the lv with the lvm-thin will be a zfs pool. 7. For example it's xfsdump/xfsrestore for xfs, dump/restore for ext2/3/4. If you use Debian, Ubuntu, or Fedora Workstation, the installer defaults to ext4. -- zfs set atime=off (pool) this disables the Accessed attribute on every file that is accessed, this can double IOPS. ZFS expects to be in total control, and will behave weird or kicks out disks if you're putting a "smart" HBA between ZFS and the disks. With Proxmox you need a reliable OS/boot drive more than a fast one. ZFS: Full Comparison. Ext4 is the default file system on most Linux distributions for a reason. Replication uses snapshots to minimize traffic sent over. , it will run fine on one disk. ) Then, once Proxmox is installed, you can create a thin lvm pool encompassing the entire SSD. Originally I was going to use EXT4 on KVM til I ran across ProxMox (and ZFS). Putting ZFS on hardware RAID is a bad idea. For a consumer it depends a little on what your expectations are. What about using xfs for the boot disk during initial install, instead of the default ext4? I would think, for a smaller, single SSD server, it would be better than ext4? 1 r/Proxmox. Starting with Proxmox VE 3. XFS is a 64-bit journaling file system known for its high performance and efficient execution of parallel input/output (I/O) operations. . I have a 1TB ssd as the system drive, which is automatically turned into 1TB LVM, so I can create VMs on it without issue, I also have some HDDs that I want to turn into data drives for the VMs, here comes to my puzzle, should I. Supported LBA Sizes (NSID 0x1) Id Fmt Data Metadt Rel_Perf 0 - 512 0 2 1. Of course performance is not the only thing to consider: another big role is played by flexibility and ease to use/configure. 25 TB. 2. 6 and F2FS[8] filesystems support extended attributes (abbreviated xattr) when. Then I was thinking about: 1. That bug apart, any delayed allocation filesystem (ext4 and btrfs included) will lose a significant number or un-synched data in case of uncontrolled poweroff. Is there any way of converting file system without any configuration changes in mongo? I tried below steps: detach disk; unmount dir; attach disk; create partition with xfs file system; changes on fstab file; mount dirFinally found a solution : parted -s -a optimal /dev/sda mklabel gpt -- mkpart primary ext4 1 -1s. However, from my understanding Proxmox distinguishes between (1) OS storage and (2) VM storage, which must run on seperate disks. Once you have selected Directory it is time to fill out some info. at previous tutorial, we've been extended lvm partition vm on promox with Live CD by using add new disk. Be sure to have a working backup before trying filesystem conversion. I am installing proxmox 3 iso, in SSD, and connected 4x 2TB disk into the same server, configured software Raid 10 in linux for installing VM later. Add the storage space to Proxmox. ;-) Proxmox install handles it well, can install XFS from the start. Step 1: Download Proxmox ISO Image. Even if I'm not running Proxmox it's my preferred storage setup. Each Proxmox VE server needs a subscription with the right CPU-socket count. Also, with lvm you can have snapshots even with ext4. #1. I've never had an issue with either, and currently run btrfs + luks. This is not ZFS. Will sagen, wenn Du mit hohen IO-Delay zu kämpfen hast, sorge für mehr IOPS (Verteilung auf mehr Spindeln, z. our set up uses one osd per node , the storage is raid 10 + a hot spare . Fstrim is show something useful with ext4, like X GB was trimmed . Over time, these two filesystems have grown to serve very similar needs. So the rootfs lv, as well as the log lv, is in each situation a normal. ext4 is slow. During the installation wizard, you'll just format it to ext4 and create two partitions -- one named "local," which. 2 SSD. The XFS PMDA ships as part of the pcp package and is enabled by default on installation. Você pode então configurar a aplicação de cotas usando uma opção de montagem. Although swap on the SD Card isn't ideal, putting more ram in the system is far more efficient than chasing faster OS/boot drives. It replicates guest volumes to another node so that all data is available without using shared storage. This was our test's, I cannot give any benchmarks, as the servers are already in production. NEW: Version 8. XFS uses one allocation group per file system with striping. 09 MB/s. EXT4 - I know nothing about this file system. 1. This of course comes at the cost of not having many important features that ZFS provides. . If anything goes wrong you can. Sistemas de archivos de almacenamiento compartido 27. RAID. WARNING: Anything on your soon to be server machine is going to be deleted, so make sure you have all the important stuff off of it. No ext4, você pode ativar cotas ao criar o sistema de arquivo ou mais tarde em um sistema de arquivo existente. I've never had an issue with either, and currently run btrfs + luks. The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise. One of the main reasons the XFS file system is used is for its support of large chunks of data. 3. I did the same recently but from REFS to another REFS Volume (again the chain needed to be upgraded) and this time the chain was only. Starting from version 4. The /var/lib/vz is now included in the LV root. Share. Ubuntu 18. I get many times a month: [11127866. Ubuntu has used ext4 by default since 2009’s Karmic Koala release. -- is very important for it to work here. ext4 is a filesystem - no volume management capabilities. 1 and a LXC container with Fedora 27. 4. The terminology is really there for mdraid, not ZFS. Then i manually setup proxmox and after that, i create a lv as a lvm-thin with the unused storage of the volume group. Ext4文件系统是Ext3的继承者,是Linux下的主流文件系统。经过多年的发展,它是目前最稳定的文件系统之一。但是,老实说,与其他Linux文件系统相比,它并不是最好的Linux文件系统。 在XFS vs Ext4方面,XFS在以下几个方面优于Ext4: Then i manually setup proxmox and after that, i create a lv as a lvm-thin with the unused storage of the volume group. Select Proxmox Backup Server from the dropdown menu. Meaning you can get high availability VMs without ceph or any other cluster storage system. One caveat I can think of is /etc/fstab and some other things may be somewhat different for ZFS root and so should probably not be transferred over. Pro: supported by all distro's, commercial and not, and based on ext3, so it's widely tested, stable and proven. 3. El sistema de archivos ext4 1. We tried, in proxmox, EXT4, ZFS, XFS, RAW & QCOW2 combinations. using ESXi and Proxmox hypervisors on identical hardware, same VM parameters and the same guest OS – Linux Ubuntu 20. But unlike EXT4, you'll gain the ability to. w to write it. 1 more reply. Complete toolset for administering virtual machines, containers, the host system, clusters and all necessary resources. XFS and ext4 aren't that different. The process occurs in the opposite. The Proxmox Backup Server installer, which partitions the local disk(s) with ext4, xfs or ZFS, and installs the operating system. Feature-for-feature, it doesn't use significantly more RAM than ext4 or NTFS or anything else does. €420,00EUR. Prior using of the command EFI partition should be the second one as stated before (therefore in my case sdb2). . El sistema de archivos XFS. aaron said: If you want your VMs to survive the failure of a disk you need some kind of RAID. directory" it will let you add the LVM and format it as ext4 or xfs If that does not work, just wipe the LVM off the disk and than try adding it. Set. #1 Just picked up an Intel Coffee Lake NUC. Utilice. Select the local-lvm, Click on “Remove” button. 6-pve1. Replace file-system with the mount point of the XFS file system. Cheaper SSD/USB/SD cards tend to get eaten up by Proxmox, hence the High Endurance. resemble your workload, to compare xfs vs ext4 both with and without glusterfs. Since we have used a Filebench workloads for testing, our idea was to find the best FS for each test. ext4 /dev/sdc mke2fs 1. I just gave a quick test with XFS instead of EXT4. I have not tried vmware, they don’t support software raid and I’m not sure there’s a RAID card for the u. Edit: fsdump / fsrestore means the corresponding system backup and restore to for that file system. Install Proxmox from Debian (following Proxmox doc) 3. And ext3. ext4. This is a sub that aims at bringing data hoarders together to share their passion with like minded…27. 1. $ sudo resize2fs /dev/vda1 resize2fs 1. Now you can create an ext4 or xfs filesystem on the unused disk by navigating to Storage/Disks -> Directory. The four hard drives used for testing were 6TB Seagate IronWolf NAS (ST6000VN0033. This is addressed in this knowledge base article; the main consideration for you will be the support levels available: Ext4 is supported up to 50TB, XFS up to 500TB. Create zfs zvol. Backups can be started via the GUI or via the vzdump command line tool. g. You will need a ZIL device. All have pros and cons. XFS与Ext4性能比较. That is reassuring to hear. 5) and the throughput went up to (woopie doo) 11 MB/s on a 1 GHz Ethernet LAN. Austria/Graz. Unmount the filesystem by using the umount command: # umount /newstorage. 2 we changed the LV data to a thin pool, to provide snapshots and native performance of the disk. They perform differently for some specific workloads like creating or deleting tenthousands of files / folders. Configuration. ZFS, the Zettabyte file system, was developed as part of the Solaris operating system created by Sun Microsystems. CoW ontop of CoW should be avoided, like ZFS ontop of ZFS, qcow2 ontop of ZFS, btrfs ontop of ZFS and so on. by default, Proxmox only allows zvols to be used with VMs, not LXCs. The ID should be the name you can easily identify the store, we use the same name as the name of the directory itself. El sistema de archivos es mayor de 2 TiB con inodos de 512 bytes. The Proxmox VE installer, which partitions the local disk(s) with ext4, XFS, BTRFS (technology preview), or ZFS and installs the operating system. . While it is possible to migrate from ext4 to XFS, it. Proxmox Backup is based on the famous Debian Linux distribution. It is the default file system in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. ZFS is a filesystem and volume manager combined. Before that happens, either rc. ext4 ) you want to use for the directory, and finally enter a name for the directory (e. In terms of XFS vs Ext4, XFS is superior to Ext4 in the following aspects: Larger Partition Size and File Size: Ext4 supports partition size up to 1 EiB and file. It'll use however much you give it, but it'll also clear out at the first sign of high memory usage. Things like snapshots, copy-on-write, checksums and more. Proxmox Filesystems Unveiled: A Beginner’s Dive into EXT4 and ZFS. This will create a. Well if you set up a pool with those disks you would have different vdev sizes and. + Access to Enterprise Repository. With iostat XFS zd0 gave 2. Utilice. sdd 8:48 0 3. XFS has a few features that ext4 has not like CoW but it can't be shrinked while ext4 can. Results seemed. mount somewhere. That's right, XFS "repairs" errors on the fly, whereas ext4 requires you to remount read-only and fsck. I've ordered a single M. It will result in low IO performance. 9 /sec. These quick benchmarks are just intended for reference purposes for those wondering how the different file-systems are comparing these days on the latest Linux kernel across the popular Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS mainline choices. EXT4 vs. Promox - How to extend LVM Partition VM Proxmox on the Fly. BTRFS and ZFS are metadata vs. raid-10 mit 6 Platten; oder SSDs, oder Cache). Subscription Agreements. ISO's could probably be stored on SSD as they are relatively small. EDIT: I have tested a bit with ZFS and Proxmox Backup Server for quite a while (both hardware and VMs) and ZFS' deduplication and compression have next to 0 gains. BTRFS integration is currently a technology preview in Proxmox VE. • 2 yr. backups ). After searching the net, seeing youtube tutorials, and reading manuals for hours - I still can not understand the difference between LVM and Directory. michaelpaoli 2 yr. Press Enter to Install Proxmox VE 7. then run: Code: ps ax | grep file-restore. As PBS can also check for data integrity on the software level, I would use a ext4 with a single SSD. 1) using an additional single 50GB drive per node formatted as ext4. mount /dev/vdb1 /data. g. Note the use of ‘--’, to prevent the following ‘-1s’ last-sector indicator from being interpreted. Note that when adding a directory as a BTRFS storage, which is not itself also the mount point, it is highly recommended to specify the actual mount point via the is_mountpoint option. Similar: Ext4 vs XFS – Which one to choose. After installation, in proxmox env, partition SSD in ZFS for three, 32GB root, 16GB swap, and 512MB boot. Create a zvol, use it as your VM disk. XFS or ext4 should work fine. This article here has a nice summary of ZFS's features: acohdehydrogenase • 4 yr. For LXC, Proxmox uses ZFS subvols, but ZFS subvols cannot be formatted with a different filesystem. Journaling ensures file system integrity after system crashes (for example, due to power outages) by keeping a record of file system. (You can also use RAW or something else, but this removes a lot of the benefits of things like Thin Provisioning. Datacenter > Storage. Thanks!I installed proxmox with pretty much the default options on my hetzner server (ZFS, raid 1 over 2 SSDs I believe). . What the installer sets up as default depends on the target file system. EXT4 is very low-hassle, normal journaled filesystem. xfs_growfs is used to resize and apply the changes. 52TB I want to dedicate to GlusterFS (which will then be linked to k8s nodes running on the VMs through a storage class). ZFS also offers data integrity, not just physical redundancy. ZFS is an advanced filesystem and many of its features focus mainly on reliability. A directory is a file level storage, so you can store any content type like virtual disk images, containers, templates, ISO images or backup files. Ext4 has a more robust fsck and runs faster on low-powered systems. , where PVE can put disk images of virtual machines, where ISO files or container templates for VM/CT creation may be, which storage may be used for backups, and so on. Small_Light_9964 • 1 yr. xfs is really nice and reliable. Testing. XFS được phát triển bởi Silicon Graphics từ năm 1994 để hoạt động với hệ điều hành riêng biệt của họ, và sau đó chuyển sang Linux trong năm 2001. And this lvm-thin i register in proxmox and use it for my lxc containers. Una vez que hemos conocido las principales características de EXT4, vamos a hablar sobre Btrfs, el que se conoce como sucesor natural del sistema de archivos EXT4. 2 nvme. Dependending on the hardware, ext4 will generally have a bit better performance. I've been running Proxmox for a couple years and containers have been sufficient in satisfying my needs. and it may be advisable to utilize ZFS for non-root directories while utilizing ext4 for the remainder of the system for optimal performance. The problem (which i understand is fairly common) is that performance of a single NVMe drive on zfs vs ext4 is atrocious. 压测过程中 xfs 在高并发 72个并发情况下出现thread_running 抖动,而ext4 表现比较稳定。. Is there any way to automagically avoid/resolve such conflicts, or should I just do a clean ZFS. Proxmox VE Linux kernel with KVM and LXC support Complete toolset for administering virtual machines, containers, the host system, clusters and all necessary resourcesI'm not 100% sure about this. Code: mount /media/data. Between 2T and 4T on a single disk, any of these would probably have similar performance. You either copy everything twice or not. Let’s go through the different features of the two filesystems. In the vast realm of virtualization, Proxmox VE stands out as a robust, open-source solution that many IT professionals and hobbyists alike have come to rely on. 9. ext4 is a bit more efficient with small files as their default metadata size is slightly smaller. While ZFS has more overhead, it also has a bunch of performance enhancements like compression and ARC which often “cancel out” the overhead. Yes. Sure the snapshot creation and rollback ist faster with btrfs but with ext4 on lvm you have a faster filesystem. With the -D option, replace new-size with the desired new size of the file system specified in the number of file system blocks. Can this be accomplished with ZFS and is. (Install proxmox on the NVME, or on another SATA SSD). The EXT4 f ile system is 48-bit with a maximum file size of 1 exbibyte, depending on the host operating system. Plus, XFS is baked in with most Linux distributions so you get that added bonus To answer your question, however, if ext4 and btrfs were the only two filesystems, I would choose ext4 because btrfs has been making headlines about courrpting people's data and I've used ext4 with no issue. The client uses the following format to specify a datastore repository on the backup server (where username is specified in the form of user @ realm ): [ [username@]server [:port]:]datastore. 현재 Ext4는 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6의 기본 파일 시스템으로 단일 파일 및 파일 시스템 모두에서 최대 16 TB 크기 까지 지원합니다. hardware RAID. Since NFS and ZFS are both file based storage, I understood that I'd need to convert the RAW files to qcow2. They perform differently for some specific workloads like creating or deleting tenthousands of files / folders. There are a couple of reasons that it's even more strongly recommended with ZFS, though: (1) The filesystem is so robust that the lack of ECC leaves a really big and obvious gap in the data integrity chain (I recall one of the ZFS devs saying that using ZFS without ECC is akin to putting a screen door on a submarine). Proxmox VE Linux kernel with KVM and LXC support. Linux filesystems EXT4 vs XFS, what to choose, what is better. However Proxmox is a Debian derivative so installing properly is a gigantic PITA. Otherwise you would have to partition and format it yourself using the CLI. I understand Proxmox 6 now has SSD TRIM support on ZFS, so that might help. But running zfs on raid shouldn't lead to anymore data loss than using something like ext4. You really need to read a lot more, and actually build stuff to. Proxmox VE Community Subscription 4 CPUs/year. Yes you have miss a lot of points: - btrfs is not integrated in the PMX web interface (for many good reasons ) - btrfs develop path is very slow with less developers. # xfs_growfs -d /dev/sda1. Sun Microsystems originally created it as part of its Solaris operating system. For this Raid 10 Storage (4x 2TB HDD Sata, usable 4TB after raid 10) , I am considering either xfs , ext3 or ext4 . Plan 1 GiB RAM per 1 TiB data, better more! If there is not enough RAM you need to add some hyper fast SSD cache device. Red Hat Training. Install Debian: 32GB root (ext4), 16GB swap, and 512MB boot in NVMe. The ext4 file system is still fully supported in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 and can be selected at installation. So yes you can do it but it's not recommended and could potentially cause data loss. ESXi with a hardware RAID controller. What you get in return is a very high level of data consistency and advanced features. When you do so Proxmox will remove all separately stored data and puts your VM's disk back. A execução do comando quotacheck em um sistema de. • 1 yr. The installer will auto-select the installed disk drive, as shown in the following screenshot: The Advanced Options include some ZFS performance-related configurations such as compress, checksum, and ashift or. If it’s speed you’re after then regular Ext4 or XFS performs way better, but you lose the features of Btrfs/ZFS along the way. After installation, in proxmox env, partition SSD in ZFS for three, 32GB root, 16GB swap, and 512MB boot. But unless you intend to use these features, and know how to use them, they are useless. ago. So XFS is a bit more flexible for many inodes. or use software raid. If you are okay to lose VMs and maybe the whole system if a disk fails you can use both disks without a mirrored RAID. Actually, I almost understand the. While RAID 5 and 6 can be compared to RAID Z. 10 were done both with EXT4 and ZFS while using the stock mount options / settings each time. and post the output here. want to run insecure privileged LXCs you would need to bind-mount that SMB share anyway and by directly bind-mounting a ext4/xfs formated thin LV you skip that SMB overhead. The hardware raid controller will and does function the same regardless if the file system is NTFS, ext(x), xfs, etc etc. OpenMediaVault gives users the ability to set up a volume as various different types of filesystems, with the main being Ext4, XFS, and BTRFS. If you're looking to warehouse big blobs of data or lots of archive and reporting; then by all means ZFS is a great choice. If you choose anything else and ZFS, you will get a thin pool for the guest storage by default. Proxmox actually creates the « datastore » in an LVM so you’re good there. Starting with ext4, there are indeed options to modify the block size using the "-b" option with mke2fs. An ext4 or xfs filesystem can be created on a disk using the fs create subcommand. Creating filesystem in Proxmox Backup Server. Table of. The maximum total size of a ZFS file system is exbibytes minus one byte. Wanted to run a few test VMs at home on it, nothing. I have a pcie NVMe drive which is 256gb in size and I then have two 3TB iron wolf drives in. Prior to EXT4, in many distributions, EXT3 was the default file-system. The compression ratio of gzip and zstd is a bit higher while the write speed of lz4 and zstd is a bit higher. Copy-on-Write (CoW): ZFS is a Copy-on-Write filesystem and works quite different to a classic filesystem like FAT32 or NTFS. Fourth: besides all the above points, yes, ZFS can have a slightly worse performance depending on these cases, compared to simpler file systems like ext4 or xfs. on NVME, vMware and Hyper-V will do 2. Another advantage with ZFS storage is that you can use ZFS send/receive on a specific volume where as ZFS in dir will require a ZFS send/receive on the entire filesystem (dataset) or in worst case the entire pool. b) Proxmox is better than FreeNAS for virtualization due to the use of KVM, which seems to be much more. 2) Proxmox 2. by carum carvi » Sat Apr 25, 2020 1:14 am. 0, XFS is the default file system instead of ext4. Everything on the ZFS volume freely shares space, so for example you don't need to statically decide how much space Proxmox's root FS requires, it can grow or shrink as needed. Results were the same, +/- 10% Yes you can snapshot a zvol like anything else in ZFS. Hi, xfs und ext4 sind beides gute Datei-Systeme! Aber beide machen aus einem raid1 mit 4TB-Sata-Platten kein Turbo. ext4 vs xfs vs. ext4 4 threads: 74 MiB/sec. #1. for that you would need a mirror). Results were the same, +/- 10%. To install PCP, enter: # yum install pcp. 6-3. I have set up proxmox ve on a dell R720. Compressing the data is definitely worth it since there is no speed penalty. ZFS is a combined file system and logical volume manager designed by Sun Microsystems. 2 Unmount and Delete lvm-thin. ago. 2, the logical volume “data” is a LVM-thin pool, used to store block based guest. 3 and following this guide to install it on a Hetzner server with ZFS Encryption enabled. Oct. The Proxmox VE installer, which partitions the local disk(s) with ext4, XFS, BTRFS (technology preview), or ZFS and installs the operating system. READ UPDATE BELOW.